Daniil Medvedev stated he finds the ATP’s rationalization of why it is not awarding rating factors for Wimbledon way more “logical” than Wimbledon’s unique justification for banning gamers from Russia and Belarus from competing at this 12 months’s match.
The All England Garden Tennis Membership (AELTC) introduced in April that gamers from Russia and Belarus would not be allowed to enter the draw for this 12 months’s championship following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The choice prompted the ATP and WTA to announce on Friday that points would not be awarded due to the unilateral coverage by Wimbledon to ban the gamers.
The choice impacts Russian males’s world No.2 Medvedev, who sailed through the opening round of the French Open at Roland Garros in straight units on Tuesday.
“About ATP determination, not straightforward to remark, however once I learn the FAQ of ATP, why they made this determination, as a result of they’re explaining themself, they don’t seem to be simply saying, ‘OK, we determined that,’ I discovered it very logical what they are saying not less than,” Medvedev stated. “That is what I did not discover in Wimbledon explanations. I am not saying which determination is correct, however not less than up to now in explaining their choices, I discovered ATP simply extra logical.”
Medvedev, 26, might turn out to be the highest participant within the rankings off the again of the choice, as present No.1 Novak Djokovic won’t be able to defend the two,000 factors he collected by profitable final 12 months’s championship. That deficit will doubtless see Djokovic drop beneath Medvedev within the rankings.
“I might be actually comfortable to play Wimbledon,” Medvedev stated. “I like Wimbledon. I like enjoying on grass. I’ll play on grass after Roland Garros. [If] there aren’t any factors, I turn out to be No. 1, nicely, nice for me. If there are factors, I can not turn out to be No. 1, I’ll be gutted. It’s what it’s. I can not change some choices, each about ATP and Wimbledon.”
Medvedev eased by his first spherical at Roland Garros in Paris, dispatching Argentina’s Facundo Bagnis in straight units 6-2, 6-2, 6-2. He was happy to return by unscathed as he underwent a process to take away a hernia within the buildup to Roland Garros, which means he performed just one match on clay within the run-up to his sport on Tuesday.
Medvedev is hoping for a run right here, on a floor he has publicly acknowledged up to now is his least favourite, and a spotlight will then shift to the grass season. Regardless of not being permitted to play at Wimbledon, he stated he’ll doubtless play three grass-court tournaments this summer time which are provisionally at ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Halle and Mallorca.
“I’ll play on grass after Roland Garros,” Medvedev stated. “But when I can not [play at Wimbledon], I imply, [I am] simply going to organize for subsequent tournaments, and, you understand, simply comply with what’s taking place there [at Wimbledon].”
The choice to not award factors at Wimbledon has been a scorching matter at Roland Garros this week. 4-time Grand Slam champion Naomi Osaka stated on Monday she was contemplating skipping the tournament this 12 months after the factors name, whereas Canadian competitor Denis Shapovalov was bemused by each choices.
“I do not agree with both [decision],” Shapovalov stated. “I feel, initially, you probably have a professional competitors, that everyone must be competing. I utterly perceive the politics and the scenario they’re in. However once more, you probably have a tennis match that is presupposed to have one of the best athletes on the earth, it should not matter the place you are from, this and that, you understand? So all people must be competing.
“I additionally do not agree with the ATP to take out all of the factors. Probably the most guys it is affecting are the fellows within the prime rankings.”
Shapovalov added that he was not consulted in regards to the determination by the ATP. He was speaking after his first-round loss at Roland Garros, as he crashed out to Holger Rune 3-6, 1-6, 6-7 (4). “I feel they may have gone with it a unique approach, possibly hold 50 p.c like they’ve up to now or some type of equity,” Shapovalov stated.